….and they’re blaming it on the smoking ban. When you look at the numbers, it’s pretty hard to argue with that assumption. Overall, casino revenue is down 7 percent while Illinois’ numbers are down 20.3 percent. It’s not that attendance is down. There’s another reason.
“Although the number of people coming to the casinos is about the same, the time they spend inside is down. They’re outside smoking. And in this business, if you’re not putting money in the machine or on the table—time is money.” (Tom Swoik, executive director of the Illinois Casino Gaming Association)
Illinois is different from Michigan in that all casino’s are effected. There are no tribal lands in Illinois. The problem is there are also no land based casino’s right now. All the casino’s are old riverboats that are permanently docked, so they’re all on rivers. The rivers are all close to the border states of Iowa, Indiana, and Missouri so in most cases, you can literally go a mile and a half across a bridge and be in a casino that allows smoking. What the article doesn’t say is how Peoria is doing. The Par-A-Dice Casino in East Peoria is at least an hour and a half to two hours from a smoking casino. I’d be surprised if they saw a 20 percent drop, but it wouldn’t surprise me if the Moline riverboat dropped much higher due to another boat in Davenport, IA less than a mile away.
My opinion is still that Illinois is not the problem. The problem is the surrounding states being pansy’s and giving into the casino lobby. They need to create a level playing field. It’s always tough to be the first to do something. Illinois is going to take some hits, but in the long run, they are making the right decision. Delaware did the same thing and while their revenues dropped at first, they have recovered and are now above the pre-ban level. It can be done. It just takes lawmakers with some guts to make the right move.



Recent Comments